Normal Game Thread Elsword Mafia Game Thread

I'm out for now, will be back in next 13 hours from now and if the vote still the same I'm just going to make a case on someome till I'm die.

 

If you just attribute all of the scummy facets of your play in this game to "playstyle", then that should tell you that your playstyle is hamstringing you. You can never stop improving. Scummy play is scummy play.

I am. I'm pretty good, I feel, at understand how people approach the game. I'm able to get on top of it more easily, and I can make my reads from there, instead of being plunged into the deep end. It also helps that I'm pretty familiar with 3 players, where I was familiar with none in the previous game.

 

Why? because you basically interrupted an argument between me and prada. Picked a side and went on from there. I expected something like this from you. "you have failed to demonstrate". What more do i need to demonstrate than an actualy quote of your actions? Take it from my stance. You and Prada were going back and forth. Suddenly out of nowhere a wild me appear and pick one of your posts, back up prada indirectly and then go ham on you and turn the case 180 degree and make it out to be a huge deal and then continue on from where prada stopped and justify it and paint it to be the best thing we should do this DP.

proactive play? swaying people and leading them into a wagon is called proactive? how so? who will get blamed if that target flips townie? YOU. I would understand if you were convinced 100% that I was scum through investigation of some sort. Or if it was even 2nd or 3rd DP. But first? nope ratchet that was not proactive play at all by backing up prada wagon and going ham on it.

I went on about them one by one last DP. Or do you want us to repeat DP1 discussion all over again?

I don't mind with you that you had a scum read and decided to push someone. My main concern is you joined prada already weak argument that was answered and dodged by him and turned it out into a big thing and set the entire thing into chaos from there. The way you approached this entire situation was not a townie movement by all means.

My reasoning is that you are giving someone who barely contributed like ever a light town read over other inactive players who made much more quality posts than him. Even if you disagree with what some of their points. You basically gave a dude who went "Oh I am voting rise because guts" a light town read over someone who gave a full decent posts about his reads. How is that not weird? you tell me.

All the things I provided and you still ask me "why"? whelp shit.... If what I provided does not even link the slightest possible buddying/trying to get into prada good side then I have no idea what will.

 

edit* meant rice not rise.

 

I am liking SK more and more with every post.

 

Mafia isn't a safe hugbox, SK. Everyone is free to comment on anything in the game, because we're all supposed to be playing it. There is no reason to expect someone to stay quiet until you're done just because you are focusing exclusively on one player at the time. I'm absolutely free to interrupt at my leisure, just as anyone else is free to interrupt everyone else.

Voting by directly responding to someone who was humming and harring over it is proactive. That was the point.

I addressed them all. You either have't read that, or have ignored it.

You're not backing yourself up here. You're just describing it in some way and pretending like it's just a fact automatically. You still haven't demonstrated why joining an argument mid-way is a bad thing, itself. What exactly is scummy about that, in and of itself?

I'm not saying you can't disagree with my read, but I have explained the why to death by now. But which inactive player has made more quality posts than Rise?

You can start by actually qualifying your claims. You're saying "this is x" while never showing how "X" is scummy itself. You might think interrupting is scummy, but you haven't demonstrated why you think that.

 

TMI

 

At least not worse than thinking that I change my vote bcus I buddying with SK or Mafia game plan or saying I did all that for my own benefit as scum. How logical is that again. I know not all thing above were being said by you. But why scum want to tie a vote so no one die? But a townie is being seen as Scummy move? Im preplex from hearing all that.

Scum will kill all players by chance.

I already make it clear countless of times that all of my previous decisions was base on my intuition and not from some sort of behind the scene planning.

But people still maintain their vote on me.

 

What is that? Teenage Mutant Innpcent?

 

Innocent**

 

Because it starves town of information. If Town burn their lynch without using it, then Day 2, they have a lot less to go off. They're effectively restarting Day 1. Generally, not lynching doesn't guarantee Town an extra lynch as well, so worst case all it gives is an extra Night. Night Phase is not the Town Phase. It's the scum phase, where traditionally, the only action that would occur is the scum kill. In that sense, you could say the Day is where the Town kill, and the Night is when the scum kill. Exchanging a Day for a Night is a net loss for the Town. Scum know that. It serves scum better, then, to assist in the Town hurting itself, rather than getting a cheap lynch Day 1.

I explained all this in the last game, though.

 

Too Much Information.

 

She is saying you information slipped. TMI means Too much information. She is saying that when hir said they were Town, its NAI and so a read from it couldn't be generated from that alone. I Somewhat disagree with that sentiment and considered Prada saying that as somewhat Scummy because I expect Prada to be able to come up with a better argument than "I'm Town" but ultimately, its NAI.

 

They.

EBWOP, don't know your pronoun.

 

I missed one. Sorry @Prada, I just assumed you were a gal because of your avatar.